There has never been a time when we have had access to as much information as we do now. If I want to learn how somebody trains a young horse from the ground up, I can watch it happen. If I have a question about a strange behavior my horse is exhibiting, there is a very good chance that somebody else has already had the same question. There are people all over the world sharing years of experience, hard-earned knowledge, and things they have learned the long way around, and we get to benefit from it without having to make every mistake ourselves. For all of the things people complain about when it comes to social media, I think that part is pretty incredible.
The horse world has benefited from it in a particularly interesting way. There was a time when so much of what you knew came from the people immediately around you. Your trainer taught you what they knew, your barn had its own way of doing things, and your experience was largely shaped by whoever happened to be in your orbit. Now, you can spend an afternoon watching riders from completely different backgrounds and disciplines, listening to veterinarians explain things you have never encountered, or following someone who manages horses in a way that is completely different from what you grew up around. You can find information you didn’t even know you needed.
That is the good part.
The strange part is that the same world that made everyone’s knowledge so accessible also made everyone’s opinion equally accessible.
Everybody has something to say. And unlike twenty years ago, they can say it directly to you.
It is hard to exist on social media without seeing this play out. Someone shares a picture of a new horse and the comments start dissecting the horse before the person has even finished introducing it. A rider posts a training video and suddenly strangers are analyzing a few seconds of footage as though they were getting paid to coach them. Somebody shares what worked for their horse and someone else feels the need to explain why they would never do it that way. Sometimes the discussion is genuinely helpful. Sometimes it is just a lot of very confident people who have never met each other trying to prove that they are right. The tricky part is that those two things can look remarkably similar from the outside. Advice and criticism can sound alike. Expertise and confidence can sound alike. The internet does not give you much context for figuring out which one you are looking at.
There is a difference between knowing something about horses and knowing a horse. Social media is very good at giving us the first one and almost completely incapable of giving us the second. You can watch a video and recognize a training issue, know the terminology for what you are seeing, and even have a reasonable idea of how you might address it, but you still do not know what happened five minutes before the camera was turned on. You do not know what that horse was like yesterday, what the rider has been working on for the last six months, or what their trainer has already decided they are going to address next week.
That context matters more than I think we give it credit for. A horse that looks behind the leg in one video might have spent the previous ten minutes being incredibly forward and the rider is deliberately asking for something different. A horse that looks tense might have just had the spook of their lives, or might be working through something their trainer is specifically trying to address. A horse that appears to be having a bad day might simply be having a bad day. Anyone who has spent enough time around horses knows that sometimes there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for something that looks completely inexplicable from the other side of a screen.
I think we have also become increasingly comfortable making judgments from very small pieces of information. We see the fifteen-second video, not the hour-long lesson where they cried after, or the edited photograph, not that the horse was trying to make them eat dirt five strides before. We know only what someone chose to share, but almost never the real story behind it. And that part fascinates me both as a human in this digital era, a professional in the marketing and social media space, and as a rider that chooses to share her journey on the internet. We are constantly being given tiny windows into other people’s lives, but somewhere along the way we have gotten very good at convincing ourselves that we can see the whole house through them. With that, we create a vicious cycle of making assumptions and judgments. Once the story has been constructed, it can become much harder to remember that we built most of it ourselves.
And this is where horse people get themselves into trouble online. We are very good at recognizing patterns because that is part of being around horses. You learn to notice when a horse is moving differently, when a behavior is unusual, or when something does not look quite right. That instinct is valuable. But recognizing something is not the same as understanding it, and understanding one possibility is not the same as knowing that possibility is what is actually happening.
There is nothing inherently wrong with having an opinion about something you see online. Of course there isn’t. I have opinions about things I see online all the time. The difference, I think, is whether I believe that having an opinion automatically creates an obligation for somebody else to hear it. That is where things get a little murky.
There are plenty of situations where speaking up is the right thing to do. There are people who genuinely behave badly, animals that genuinely need someone to advocate for them, and situations where staying quiet would be easier but not better. I do not think “everyone should just mind their own business” is a particularly useful philosophy, especially when something important is actually happening. But there is a pretty significant gap between saying something when it matters and feeling compelled to comment on everything you don’t like.
Social media has made that gap very easy to cross.
There is also something particularly strange about how quickly horse people can turn a difference in approach into a difference in character. You choose a different bit, feed something someone else would not, train a movement differently, put your horse on a different turnout schedule, or make a management decision that would not be your neighbor’s choice, and suddenly the conversation can become about whether you are a good horse owner. Somewhere along the way, “I would do that differently” becomes “you are doing it wrong,” and “you are doing it wrong” can become “you do not care about your horse.” That is a pretty enormous conclusion to draw from a very small amount of information.
A disagreement that once would have ended with two people thinking, well, I would not do it that way, can now become a public conversation. Then somebody else joins in. Then someone screenshots it. Someone else sees the screenshot without the original context. Before long, the conversation is no longer really about the thing that happened in the first place. It becomes about who is right, who is wrong, and what everyone thinks the situation says about the person involved. Sometimes it gets much bigger than that. We have all watched situations where someone makes a mistake or says something poorly and suddenly the internet decides that this one moment is a complete representation of who they are. The original situation almost becomes irrelevant once the pile-on starts. I think that is where the idea of accountability can get complicated. There is a difference between holding someone responsible for something they actually did and turning them into a public spectacle because a group of people decided they deserve it. And I do not think this is unique to the horse world. We just happen to have a particularly opinionated corner of the internet. Maybe that is because horses make people passionate. We care about doing right by them, and we should. We care about training correctly and making good decisions and giving our horses the best lives we can. But sometimes that passion makes it easy to forget that another person can care just as deeply and still arrive at a different decision.
Your horse is not my horse. Your circumstances are not mine. Your experience may have taught you something different from what mine taught me. That does not necessarily make either of us wrong.
I have also learned that horses are very good at making you question your own certainty. You can have years of experience and still have a horse do something that leaves you standing in the arena thinking, well, that is new. You can have a plan that has worked beautifully for one horse and discover that another horse needs something completely different. Sometimes the thing that looks like a training problem is a management problem, and sometimes what looks like a management problem turns out to be something entirely different. The longer you are around horses, the harder it becomes to believe that you can understand the whole story from one moment.
That is probably why I have become more cautious about giving advice as I have gotten more experienced. Not because I know less than I used to, but because I understand better how much I do not know about someone else’s situation. I can tell you what has worked for my horses. I can tell you what I have learned from my trainers, veterinarians, and other professionals. I can share something that I think is worth considering. What I cannot do is take a thirty-second clip of somebody else’s horse and pretend I know everything that led to that moment.
The irony is that most experienced horse people already understand this when it comes to their own horses. We know that a single ride rarely tells the whole story. We know that sometimes the answer to a problem changes once you have more information. Yet somehow, when we are looking at somebody else’s horse through a phone screen, we can become much more certain than we would ever be standing in our own barn.
Maybe that is one of the biggest differences between information and wisdom. Information tells you what something might mean. Experience teaches you how many other things it could mean, too. The internet has made the first one incredibly easy to access. The second still requires time, mistakes, observation, and a whole lot of hours learning from the sport.
But real life is usually not that simple.
The more I think about it, the more I wonder if the real problem is not that everybody has an opinion. Of course they do. We always have, and we always will. The difference is that we now have a megaphone for everybody to use freely, and we have been taught that if something bothers us, the appropriate response is to say so publicly. Maybe you see something online that you would handle differently. That is fine. Maybe you have information that could genuinely help someone. Great. Maybe you have a perspective they have never considered. There is value in sharing that, especially when it is offered with the understanding that you do not know everything happening outside the frame. But maybe you also see something and decide that you do not actually need to weigh in. That is not the same thing as not caring. Sometimes it is simply recognizing that another person’s life is not your project to manage.
There is a certain freedom in realizing that, especially when you are the one putting pieces of your own life online. Repeatedly I have gotten nasty comments on some of my posts about this, that, or the other. Most of the time, I just delete the comment and move on, or I give a simple response that I am sure feels like a win to them. It would be easy for me to click on their handle and go comment something nasty back onto their page. And maybe when I was younger, I might have, but now, with some growing up under my belt, I just keep it to myself and move on. It is important to remember that someone is always going to have an opinion. Someone will think your horse is too something or not enough of something and someone will disagree with your training, your tack, your goals, your management, or your decision to do something you have never seen them do themselves. If you let every opinion become something you have to defend, explain, or correct, you could spend your entire life arguing with people you have never met. And what a miserable way to spend your time on the internet when you could be doomscrolling on TikTok.
I do not want fewer people sharing what they know. I do not even want everyone to agree with me. Some of the most useful things I have learned have come from people who approached horses differently than I do, and sometimes being challenged is exactly what makes you reconsider something. We could all stand to get a little better at knowing the difference between learning from someone and judging them. Because everybody’s opinion is available now. That is both the gift and the problem.
We have access to more knowledge than ever before, and more opportunities to learn from one another than any generation before us. But having access to somebody else’s life does not mean we know the whole story, and having an opinion about what we see does not mean it needs to become part of the conversation. There is a difference between knowing something about horses and knowing the horse in front of you. The internet can give us information, but it cannot give us the hours in the saddle, the barn aisle conversations, the frustrating rides, the little changes you notice over months, or the history that makes one decision make sense for one particular horse.
Sometimes there is something worth saying. Sometimes there is something worth learning. And sometimes, it is just somebody else’s opinion.
Leave a Reply